Who was elected king in 1613. Election of Mikhail Feodorovich Romanov to the kingdom

Line UMK I. L. Andreeva, O. V. Volobueva. History (6-10)

History of Russia

How to Russian throne turned out to be Mikhail Romanov?

On July 21, 1613, in the Assumption Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, Michael’s crowning ceremony took place, marking the foundation of a new ruling dynasty Romanovs. How did it happen that Michael ended up on the throne, and what events preceded this? Read our material.

On July 21, 1613, in the Assumption Cathedral of the Moscow Kremlin, Michael’s crowning ceremony took place, marking the founding of the new ruling dynasty of the Romanovs. The ceremony, which took place in the Assumption Cathedral in the Kremlin, was carried out completely out of order. The reasons for this lay in the Time of Troubles, which disrupted all plans: Patriarch Filaret (by coincidence, the father of the future king), was captured by the Poles, the second head of the Church after him, Metropolitan Isidore, was in territory occupied by the Swedes. As a result, the wedding was performed by Metropolitan Ephraim, the third hierarch of the Russian Church, while the other heads gave their blessing.

So, how did it happen that Mikhail ended up on the Russian throne?

Events in the Tushino camp

In the autumn of 1609, a political crisis was observed in Tushino. The Polish king Sigismund III, who invaded Russia in September 1609, managed to split the Poles and Russians, united under the banner of False Dmitry II. Increasing disagreements, as well as the disdainful attitude of the nobles towards the impostor, forced False Dmitry II to flee from Tushin to Kaluga.

On March 12, 1610, Russian troops solemnly entered Moscow under the leadership of the talented and young commander M. V. Skopin-Shuisky, the Tsar’s nephew. There was a chance of completely defeating the forces of the impostor, and then liberating the country from the troops of Sigismund III. However, on the eve of the Russian troops setting out on a campaign (April 1610), Skopin-Shuisky was poisoned at a feast and died two weeks later.

Alas, already on June 24, 1610, the Russians were completely defeated by Polish troops. At the beginning of July 1610, the troops of Zholkiewski approached Moscow from the west, and the troops of False Dmitry II again approached from the south. In this situation, on July 17, 1610, through the efforts of Zakhary Lyapunov (brother of the rebellious Ryazan nobleman P. P. Lyapunov) and his supporters, Shuisky was overthrown and on July 19, he was forcibly tonsured a monk (in order to prevent him from becoming king again in the future). Patriarch Hermogenes did not recognize this tonsure.

Seven Boyars

So, in July 1610, power in Moscow passed to the Boyar Duma, headed by boyar Mstislavsky. The new provisional government was called the “Seven Boyars”. It included representatives of the most noble families F. I. Mstislavsky, I. M. Vorotynsky, A. V. Trubetskoy, A. V. Golitsyn, I. N. Romanov, F. I. Sheremetev, B. M. Lykov.

The balance of forces in the capital in July - August 1610 was as follows. Patriarch Hermogenes and his supporters opposed both the impostor and any foreigner on the Russian throne. Possible candidates were Prince V.V. Golitsyn or 14-year-old Mikhail Romanov, son of Metropolitan Philaret (former Patriarch of Tushino). This is how the name M.F. was heard for the first time. Romanova. Most of the boyars, led by Mstislavsky, nobles and merchants were in favor of inviting Prince Vladislav. They, firstly, did not want to have any of the boyars as king, remembering the unsuccessful experience of the reign of Godunov and Shuisky, secondly, they hoped to receive additional benefits and benefits from Vladislav, and thirdly, they feared ruin when the impostor ascended the throne. The lower classes of the city sought to place False Dmitry II on the throne.

On August 17, 1610, the Moscow government concluded an agreement with Hetman Zholkiewski on the terms of inviting the Polish prince Vladislav to the Russian throne. Sigismund III, under the pretext of unrest in Russia, did not let his son go to Moscow. In the capital, Hetman A. Gonsevsky gave orders on his behalf. The Polish king, possessing significant military strength, did not want to fulfill the conditions of the Russian side and decided to annex Moscow State to his crown, depriving him of political independence. The boyar government was unable to prevent these plans, and a Polish garrison was brought into the capital.

Liberation from Polish-Lithuanian invaders

But already in 1612, Kuzma Minin and Prince Dmitry Pozharsky, with part of the forces remaining near Moscow from the First Militia, defeated the Polish army near Moscow. The hopes of the boyars and Poles were not justified.

You can read more about this episode in the material: "".

After the liberation of Moscow from the Polish-Lithuanian invaders at the end of October 1612, the combined regiments of the first and second militias formed a provisional government - the “Council of the Whole Land”, led by princes D. T. Trubetskoy and D. M. Pozharsky. The main goal of the Council was to assemble a representative Zemsky Sobor and elect a new king.
In the second half of November, letters were sent to many cities with a request to send them to the capital by December 6 “ for state and zemstvo affairs"ten good people. Among them could be abbots of monasteries, archpriests, townspeople, and even black-growing peasants. They all had to be " reasonable and consistent", capable of " talk about state affairs freely and fearlessly, without any cunning».

In January 1613, the Zemsky Sobor began to hold its first meetings.
The most significant clergyman at the cathedral was Metropolitan Kirill of Rostov. This happened due to the fact that Patriarch Hermogenes died back in February 1613, Metropolitan Isidore of Novgorod was under the rule of the Swedes, Metropolitan Philaret was in Polish captivity, and Metropolitan Ephraim of Kazan did not want to go to the capital. Simple calculations based on the analysis of signatures under the charters show that at least 500 people were present at the Zemsky Sobor, representing various strata of Russian society from a variety of places. These included clergy, leaders and governors of the first and second militias, members of the Boyar Duma and the sovereign's court, as well as elected representatives from approximately 30 cities. They were able to express the opinion of the majority of the country's inhabitants, therefore the decision of the council was legitimate.

Who did they want to choose as king?

The final documents of the Zemsky Sobor indicate that a unanimous opinion on the candidacy of the future tsar was not developed immediately. Before the arrival of the leading boyars, the militia probably had a desire to elect Prince D.T. as the new sovereign. Trubetskoy.

It was proposed to place some foreign prince on the Moscow throne, but the majority of the council participants resolutely declared that they were categorically against the Gentiles “because of their untruth and crime on the cross.” They also objected to Marina Mnishek and the son of False Dmitry II Ivan - they called them the “thieves’ queen” and the “thief”.

Why did the Romanovs have an advantage? Kinship issues

Gradually, the majority of voters came to the idea that the new sovereign should be from Moscow families and be related to the previous sovereigns. There were several such candidates: the most noble boyar - Prince F. I. Mstislavsky, boyar Prince I. M. Vorotynsky, princes Golitsyn, Cherkassky, boyars Romanovs.
Voters expressed their decision as follows:

« We came to the general idea of ​​electing a relative of the righteous and great sovereign, the Tsar and Grand Duke, blessed in memory Fyodor Ivanovich of all Rus', so that it would be eternally and permanently the same as under him, the great sovereign, the Russian kingdom shone before all states like the sun and expanded on all sides, and many surrounding sovereigns became subject to him, the sovereign, in allegiance and obedience, and there was no blood or war under him, the sovereign, - all of us under his royal power lived in peace and prosperity».


In this regard, the Romanovs had only advantages. They were in double blood relationship with the previous kings. The great-grandmother of Ivan III was their representative Maria Goltyaeva, and the mother of the last tsar from the dynasty of Moscow princes Fyodor Ivanovich was Anastasia Zakharyina from the same family. Her brother was the famous boyar Nikita Romanovich, whose sons Fyodor, Alexander, Mikhail, Vasily and Ivan were Tsar Fyodor Ivanovich cousins. True, due to the repressions of Tsar Boris Godunov, who suspected the Romanovs of an attempt on his life, Fedor was tonsured a monk and later became Metropolitan Philaret of Rostov. Alexander, Mikhail and Vasily died, only Ivan survived, having suffered from cerebral palsy since childhood; because of this illness, he was not fit to be king.


It can be assumed that most of the participants in the cathedral had never seen Michael, who was distinguished by his modesty and quiet disposition, and had not heard anything about him before. Since childhood, he had to experience many adversities. In 1601, at the age of four, he was separated from his parents and, together with his sister Tatyana, was sent to Belozersk prison. Only a year later, the emaciated and ragged prisoners were transferred to the village of Klin, Yuryevsky district, where they were allowed to live with their mother. Real liberation occurred only after the accession of False Dmitry I. In the summer of 1605, the Romanovs returned to the capital, to their boyar house on Varvarka. Filaret, by the will of the impostor, became the Metropolitan of Rostov, Ivan Nikitich received the rank of boyar, and Mikhail, due to his young age, was enlisted as a steward. The future tsar had to go through new tests during the Time of Troubles. In 1611 - 1612, towards the end of the siege of Kitai-Gorod and the Kremlin by militias, Mikhail and his mother had no food at all, so they even had to eat grass and tree bark. The elder sister Tatyana could not survive all this and died in 1611 at the age of 18. Mikhail miraculously survived, but his health was severely damaged. Due to scurvy, he gradually developed a disease in his legs.
Among the close relatives of the Romanovs were the princes Shuisky, Vorotynsky, Sitsky, Troekurov, Shestunov, Lykov, Cherkassky, Repnin, as well as the boyars Godunov, Morozov, Saltykov, Kolychev. All together they formed a powerful coalition at the sovereign’s court and were not averse to placing their protege on the throne.

Announcement of the election of Michael as Tsar: details

The official announcement of the election of the sovereign took place on February 21, 1613. Archbishop Theodoret with clergy and boyar V.P. Morozov came to the Place of Execution on Red Square. They informed Muscovites the name of the new tsar - Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov. This news was greeted with general rejoicing, and then messengers traveled to the cities with a joyful message and the text of the sign of the cross, which the residents had to sign.

The representative embassy went to the chosen one only on March 2. It was headed by Archbishop Theodoret and boyar F.I. Sheremetev. They had to inform Mikhail and his mother of the decision of the Zemsky Sobor, obtain their consent to “sit on the kingdom” and bring the chosen ones to Moscow.


On the morning of March 14, in ceremonial clothes, with images and crosses, the ambassadors moved to the Kostroma Ipatiev Monastery, where Mikhail and his mother were. Having met at the gates of the monastery with the people's chosen one and Elder Martha, they saw on their faces not joy, but tears and indignation. Michael categorically refused to accept the honor bestowed on him by the council, and his mother did not want to bless him for the kingdom. I had to beg them for a whole day. Only when the ambassadors declared that there was no other candidate for the throne and that Michael’s refusal would lead to new bloodshed and unrest in the country, Martha agreed to bless her son. In the monastery cathedral, the ceremony of naming the chosen one to the kingdom took place, and Theodoret handed him a scepter - a symbol of royal power.

Sources:

  1. Morozova L.E. Election to the kingdom // Russian history. - 2013. - No. 1. - P. 40-45.
  2. Danilov A.G. New phenomena in the organization of power in Russia during the Time of Troubles // Questions of history. - 2013. - No. 11. - P. 78-96.

The Zemsky Sobor, convened in January 1613 (there were representatives from 50 cities and the clergy) immediately decided: not to elect a non-Christian to the throne. Many worthy people claimed the throne. However, out of everyone, they chose 16-year-old Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, who was not even in Moscow at that moment. But the former Tush residents and Cossacks stood up for him especially zealously and even aggressively. The participants of the Zemsky Sobor were afraid of the latter - everyone knew the irrepressible power of the Cossack freemen. Another candidate for king, one of the leaders of the militia, Prince D.T. Trubetskoy, tried to please the Cossacks and gain their support. He arranged rich feasts for them, but received nothing but ridicule from them in return. The Cossacks, who boldly walked around Moscow in armed crowds, looked at Mikhail Romanov as the son of the “Tushino patriarch” Filaret, who was close to them, and believed that he would be obedient to their leaders. However, Mikhail was suitable for many other people - Russian society longed for peace, certainty and mercy. Everyone remembered that Mikhail came from the family of the first wife of Ivan the Terrible, Anastasia, the “blueberry,” revered for her kindness.

The zemstvo people made the decision to elect Mikhail on February 7, and on February 21, 1613, after a solemn procession through the Kremlin and a prayer service in the Assumption Cathedral, Mikhail was officially elected to the throne. The Council sent a deputation to Kostroma to visit Mikhail. Those sent on behalf of the whole earth called the young man to the kingdom.

By the time the deputation arrived in Kostroma, Mikhail and his mother, nun Martha, lived in the Ipatiev Monastery. Here, on April 14, 1613, a meeting of the Moscow delegation with Martha and Mikhail took place. The king's mother did not agree for a long time to let her son become king. Martha can be understood: the country was in a terrible situation, and the mother, knowing the fate of Mikhail’s predecessors, was worried about the future of her foolish 16-year-old son. But the deputation begged Marfa Ivanovna so fervently that she finally gave her consent, and on May 2, 1613, Mikhail Fedorovich entered Moscow and was crowned king on July 1st.

From the book History of Russia from Rurik to Putin. People. Events. Dates author Anisimov Evgeniy Viktorovich

The election of Mikhail Romanov as Tsar and his first steps The Zemsky Sobor, convened in January 1613 (there were representatives from 50 cities and the clergy), immediately decided: not to elect a non-Christian to the throne. Many worthy people claimed the throne. However, from all of them they chose

From the book Pictures of the Past Quiet Don. Book one. author Krasnov Petr Nikolaevich

Time of Troubles in Rus'. The Donets drive the Poles out of Moscow. Election to the kingdom of Tsar Mikhail Feodorovich Ataman Mezhakov with the rest of the Dons, who were not carried away by the temptations of Sapieha and Lisovsky, remained inactive. People didn’t believe in False Dmitry II, but Tsar Vasily Shuisky

From the book History of Russia. XVII-XVIII centuries. 7th grade author Kiselev Alexander Fedotovich

§ 7. THE REIGN OF MICHAEL ROMANOV Overcoming the consequences of the Time of Troubles. Tsar Mikhail Fedorovich inherited the difficult legacy of the Time of Troubles. He was young and inexperienced. The Tsar’s mother, the “Great Elder” Marfa, and uncle Ivan Nikitich Romanov came to the rescue. They took over the main

From the book History of Russia. XVII–XVIII centuries. 7th grade author Chernikova Tatyana Vasilievna

§ 7-8. The reign of Mikhail Romanov 1. CENTRAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTCentral management. The consequences of the Troubles for the country were terrible. Burnt, deserted cities and villages lay everywhere. To restore normal life, Russia needed order, which

From the book Kingdom of Moscow author Vernadsky Georgy Vladimirovich

5. Victory of the national army and the election of Mikhail Romanov to the kingdom (1612-1613) I The fact that zemstvo detachments from the cities of the Volga region and Northern Rus' refused to besiege the Poles in Moscow did not mean that they abandoned the cause of national resistance. Rather, they have lost faith in

author Vyazemsky Yuri Pavlovich

The reign of Mikhail Romanov (1613–1645) Question 6.1 There was such a person - Andrei Kobyla. What was his role in the history of Russia? Question 6.2 From 1613 to 1619, Tsar Mikhail annually went to remote monasteries where he prayed. What did the first sovereign Romanov pray for? Question 6.3 In whose name?

From the book From Rurik to Paul I. History of Russia in questions and answers author Vyazemsky Yuri Pavlovich

The reign of Mikhail Romanov (1613–1645) Answer 6.1 From Andrei Kobyla came the Zakharyins-Koshkins and ultimately the Romanovs, the imperial dynasty. Answer 6.2 About the speedy deliverance from captivity of his father, born Fyodor Nikitich Romanov, later the “Great Sovereign and Patriarch”

From the book Great Russian Historians about the Time of Troubles author Klyuchevsky Vasily Osipovich

THE LIBERATION OF MOSCOW AND THE ELECTION OF MIKHAIL ROMANOV The beginning of a new, saving movement came from the same life-giving source that inspired the Russian masses, who rose to fight their alien enemies. From her deep faith in Divine Providence and

From the book Textbook of Russian History author Platonov Sergey Fedorovich

§ 74. Election of Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov as tsar. Zemsky Sobor 1613. Election of Mikhail Romanov as tsar. The cathedral embassy to him. The feat of Ivan Susanin Immediately after the cleansing of Moscow, the provisional government of princes Pozharsky and Trubetskoy sent letters to the cities with

author

Chapter 17 ELECTION OF MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH TO THE KINGDOM

From the book Day national unity: biography of the holiday author Eskin Yuri Moiseevich

The crowning of Mikhail Romanov All that remained was to wait for the arrival of Tsar Mikhail Romanov, elected at the Council, to the capital. It was not easy for the new autocrat to do this for the prosaic reason of the spring thaw. Therefore, the wait for the king extended for another month and a half.

From the book With Fire and Sword. Russia between the “Polish eagle” and the “Swedish lion”. 1512-1634 author Putyatin Alexander Yurievich

CHAPTER 23. ROYAL ELECTIONS OF 1613. REASONS FOR MIKHAIL ROMANOV'S VICTORY The appearance of the Kremlin, cleared of Poles, horrified the liberators. Its churches were plundered and polluted. Majority wooden buildings The occupiers dismantled it for firewood and burned it. There are militias in the basements

From the book Russian history in the faces author Fortunatov Vladimir Valentinovich

3.1.5. The election of Mikhail Romanov to the Tsar: a popular choice or “fish for lack of fish and cancer”? On July 11, 1613, on the eve of the name day of Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, his crowning ceremony took place. Kazan Metropolitan Ephraim officiated. Patriarch Filaret, former boyar Fedor

From the book History of Russia. Time of Troubles author Morozova Lyudmila Evgenievna

Chapter 17 ELECTION OF MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH TO THE KINGDOM

From the book The Romanov Boyars and the Accession of Mikhail Feodorovich author Vasenko Platon Grigorievich

Chapter Six The Zemsky Council of 1613 and the election of Mikhail Fedorovich to the royal throne I The history of the great embassy showed us how right those who did not trust the sincerity of the Poles and their assurances were. An attempt to restore state order through a union with Rech

From the book Russian History author Platonov Sergey Fedorovich

Election of Mikhail Feodorovich Romanov Elected people gathered in Moscow in January 1613. From Moscow they asked the cities to send the best, strongest and most reasonable people for the royal selection. Cities, by the way, had to think not only about electing a king, but also about how to build

The end of the 16th and beginning of the 17th centuries became a period of socio-political, economic and dynastic crisis in Russian history, which was called the Time of Troubles. The Time of Troubles began with the catastrophic famine of 1601-1603. A sharp deterioration in the situation of all segments of the population led to mass unrest under the slogan of overthrowing Tsar Boris Godunov and transferring the throne to the “legitimate” sovereign, as well as to the emergence of impostors False Dmitry I and False Dmitry II as a result of the dynastic crisis.

"Seven Boyars" - the government formed in Moscow after the overthrow of Tsar Vasily Shuisky in July 1610, concluded an agreement on the election of the Polish prince Vladislav to the Russian throne and in September 1610 allowed the Polish army into the capital.

Since 1611, patriotic sentiments began to grow in Russia. The First Militia, formed against the Poles, never managed to drive the foreigners out of Moscow. And a new impostor, False Dmitry III, appeared in Pskov. In the fall of 1611, on the initiative of Kuzma Minin, Nizhny Novgorod Led by Prince Dmitry Pozharsky, the formation of the Second Militia began. In August 1612, it approached Moscow and liberated it in the fall. The leadership of the Zemsky militia began preparing for the electoral Zemsky Sobor.

At the beginning of 1613, elected officials from “the whole earth” began to gather in Moscow. This was the first indisputably all-class Zemsky Sobor with the participation of townspeople and even rural representatives. The number of “council people” gathered in Moscow exceeded 800 people, representing at least 58 cities.

The Zemsky Sobor began its work on January 16 (January 6, old style) 1613. Representatives of “the whole earth” annulled the decision of the previous council on the election of Prince Vladislav to the Russian throne and decided: “Foreign princes and Tatar princes should not be invited to the Russian throne.”

The conciliar meetings took place in an atmosphere of fierce rivalry between various political groups that took shape in Russian society during the years of the Troubles and sought to strengthen their position by electing their contender to the royal throne. The council participants nominated more than ten candidates for the throne. IN different sources among the candidates are Fyodor Mstislavsky, Ivan Vorotynsky, Fyodor Sheremetev, Dmitry Trubetskoy, Dmitry Mamstrukovich and Ivan Borisovich Cherkassky, Ivan Golitsyn, Ivan Nikitich and Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, Pyotr Pronsky and Dmitry Pozharsky.

Data from the “Report on Patrimonies and Estates of 1613,” which records land grants made immediately after the election of the Tsar, make it possible to identify the most active members of the “Romanov” circle. The candidacy of Mikhail Fedorovich in 1613 was supported not by the influential clan of Romanov boyars, but by a circle that spontaneously formed during the work of the Zemsky Sobor, composed of minor figures from the previously defeated boyar groups.

According to a number of historians, the decisive role in the election of Mikhail Romanov to the kingdom was played by the Cossacks, who during this period became an influential social force. A movement arose among service people and Cossacks, the center of which was the Moscow courtyard of the Trinity-Sergius Monastery, and its active inspirer was the cellarer of this monastery, Avraamy Palitsyn, a very influential person among both the militias and Muscovites. At meetings with the participation of cellarer Abraham, it was decided to proclaim 16-year-old Mikhail Fedorovich, the son of Rostov Metropolitan Filaret captured by the Poles, as tsar.

The main argument of Mikhail Romanov’s supporters was that, unlike elected tsars, he was elected not by people, but by God, since he comes from a noble royal root. Not kinship with Rurik, but closeness and kinship with the dynasty of Ivan IV gave the right to occupy his throne.

Many boyars joined the Romanov party, and he was also supported by the highest Orthodox clergy - the Consecrated Cathedral.

The election took place on February 17 (February 7, old style) 1613, but the official announcement was postponed until March 3 (February 21, old style), so that during this time it would become clear how the people would accept the new king.

Letters were sent to the cities and districts of the country with the news of the election of a king and the oath of allegiance to the new dynasty.

On March 23 (13, according to other sources, March 14, old style), 1613, the ambassadors of the Council arrived in Kostroma. At the Ipatiev Monastery, where Mikhail was with his mother, he was informed of his election to the throne.

In 1611, Patriarch Hermogenes, calling on the sons of the church to defend the fatherland, insisted on electing a Russian tsar, convincing him with examples from history; but he was starved to death for this call, his life expired on February 17, 1612, but he died with the name of Michael, indicating who should be king.
-- By the end of 1612, Moscow and all average Russia, notified by the leaders of the people's militia, celebrated her salvation and triumphantly remembered the dying testament of Patriarch Hermogenes - on February 21, 1613, the unanimous choice for king fell on Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov, the son of the former Rostov Metropolitan Philaret Nikitich, who was still languishing in captivity among the Poles and returned from there only in 1619.
— The first act of the great Zemsky Sobor, which elected sixteen-year-old Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov to the Russian throne, was to send an embassy to the newly elected tsar. When sending the embassy, ​​the cathedral did not know where Mikhail was, and therefore the order given to the ambassadors said: “Go to Sovereign Mikhail Fedorovich, Tsar and Grand Duke of All Rus' in Yaroslavl.” Arriving in Yaroslavl, the embassy here only learned that Mikhail Fedorovich lives with his mother in Kostroma; without hesitation, it moved there, along with many Yaroslavl citizens who had already joined here.
— The embassy arrived in Kostroma on March 14; On the 19th, having convinced Mikhail to accept the royal crown, they left Kostroma with him, and on the 21st they all arrived in Yaroslavl. Here all the residents of Yaroslavl and the nobles who had come from everywhere, boyar children, guests, trading people with their wives and children met the new king with a procession of the cross, bringing him icons, bread and salt, and rich gifts. Mikhail Fedorovich chose the ancient Spaso-Preobrazhensky Monastery as his place of stay here. Here, in the archimandrite’s cells, he lived with his mother nun Martha and the temporary State Council, which was composed of Prince Ivan Borisovich Cherkassky with other nobles and clerk Ivan Bolotnikov with stewards and solicitors. From here, on March 23, the first letter from the tsar was sent to Moscow, informing the Zemsky Sobor of its consent to accept the royal crown. The warm weather that followed and the flooding of the rivers detained the young tsar in Yaroslavl “until it dried out.” Having received information here that the Swedes from Novgorod were going to Tikhvin, Mikhail Fedorovich from here sent Prince Prozorovsky and Velyaminov to defend this city, and sent an order to Moscow to detach troops against Zarutsky, who, having robbed Ukrainian cities, with a crowd of rebels and Marina Mnishek was going to Voronezh . Finally, on April 16, having prayed to the Yaroslavl Wonderworkers and received a blessing from Spassky Archimandrite Theophilus, accompanied by the good wishes of the people, bell ringing of all churches, Mikhail Fedorovich left a hospitable monastery in which he lived for 26 days. Soon after his arrival in Moscow, in the same 1613, Mikhail Fedorovich sent three letters of grant to the Spassky Monastery, as a result of which the welfare of the monastery, which suffered a lot during the Polish defeat, improved. And throughout his reign, the sovereign constantly had affection for Yaroslavl and remembered the place of his temporary stay. Proof of this is 15 more letters of grant given to the same monastery.
- In the first years after the accession of Mikhail Fedorovich, before the final conclusion of peace with Poland, Yaroslavl with its environs and neighboring cities often had to endure great disturbances from the Poles, and in 1615 Yaroslavl again became a rallying point for troops equipping themselves against Lisovsky, who was then troubling Uglich, Kashin, Bezhetsk, Romanov, Poshekhonye and the surrounding area of ​​Yaroslavl. In 1617, Yaroslavl was in danger from the Zaporozhye Cossacks, sent here from near the Trinity Lavra by the Polish prince Vladislav, who again decided to seek the Russian throne. Boyar Ivan Vasilyevich Cherkassky drove them away from here “with great damage.”
-- Filaret Nikitich, who returned from captivity in 1619, was installed as patriarch of the Russian church, and in next year The tsar undertook a “prayer journey” through the cities, and visited Yaroslavl.

K. D. Golovshchikov - "History of the city of Yaroslavl" - 1889.

1. Election of Michael

Immediately after the liberation of Moscow in October 1612, letters were sent to the cities to send elected people to Moscow, 10 representatives from each city, for the “Sovereign's fleece.” By January 1613, electors from 50 cities gathered in Moscow and, together with the highest clergy, surviving boyars and representatives of Moscow, formed the Zemsky Sobor.

For more than a month, various candidates were proposed and discussions continued. But on February 7, the Cossack ataman and two elected noblemen proposed to the Council the name of the son of Metropolitan Philaret, 16-year-old Mikhail Fedorovich Romanov. On February 21, 1613, Mikhail Romanov was proclaimed Tsar of the Moscow State and the Council swore an oath to him. Then ambassadors were sent from the Cathedral to Mikhail, who lived with his mother in the Ipatiev Monastery near Kostroma.

As soon as it became known that Mikhail Fedorovich was elected to the throne, one detachment of Poles headed to Kostroma to find and kill Mikhail. When the Poles approached Kostroma, they began to ask people where Mikhail was. When Ivan Susanin, who was asked this question, asked the Poles why they needed to know this, they answered that they wanted to congratulate

a new king with his election to the throne. But Susanin did not believe them and sent his grandson to warn Mikhail about the danger. He himself told the Poles this way: “There is no road here, let me lead you through the forest, along a nearby path.” The Poles were glad that now they could easily find Mikhail and followed Susanin.

The night passed, and Susanin kept leading and leading the Poles through the forest, and the forest became more and more dense. The Poles rushed to Susanin, suspecting him of deception. Then Susanin, in full confidence that the Poles would not be able to find their way out of the forest, told them: Now you can do with me what you want; but know that the king is saved and you will not reach him! The Poles killed Susanin, but they themselves died.

The family of Ivan Susanin was generously rewarded by the Tsar. In memory of this self-sacrifice, the famous composer Glinka wrote the opera “Life for the Tsar,” and a monument was erected to him in Kostroma, Susanin’s homeland.

The ambassadors of the Council for a long time begged Michael and his mother (Mikhail’s father, Metropolitan Philaret, was in Polish captivity) to become king. Mikhail's mother said that the Russian people were exhausted and would destroy Mikhail, like the previous kings. The ambassadors replied that the Russian people now well understand that without a tsar the state perishes. In the end, the ambassadors declared that if Mikhail and his mother did not agree, then Rus' would perish through their fault. 4.Mikhail's reign

IN difficult time The young Tsar Michael had to rule. The entire western part of the state was devastated, the border areas were captured by enemies - the Poles and Swedes. Gangs, and sometimes large detachments, of Poles, thieves, and robbers roamed and robbed the entire state.


Therefore, the young and inexperienced Tsar Mikhail did not dissolve the Zemsky Sobor for 13 years and ruled together with it. It became easier for Mikhail Fedorovich when in 1619 his father returned from captivity and became “the great sovereign, Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus'.” Until his death in 1633, Patriarch Filaret, in accordance with Russian traditions, helped Tsar Michael rule.

Since unrest continued in the Moscow state for a long time, Tsar Mikhail always used the help of the Zemsky Sobor in governing the country. It should be said that the Zemsky Sobors played a purely advisory role. In other words, the tsar consulted with the Zemsky Sobor on various issues, but final decisions made it himself, agreeing or disagreeing with the opinion of the Council.

Russian Zemsky Councils consisted of three parts:

1. "Consecrated Cathedral", i.e. senior clergy.

2. "Boyar Duma", i.e. know.

3. "Earth", i.e. elected from the “servants” (nobility) and “taxable” free people - townspeople and peasants.

The Zemsky Councils of these times developed a tradition: the requests and wishes of the “land” were almost always fulfilled by the tsar, even when they were unfavorable to the boyars. Zemsky Sobors forever destroyed the dream of the “princes” about the “boyar tsar”. The king's sole power increased, but he always relied on the "ground", i.e. people, and the “land” always supported the king.

2. Return to order

Tsar Michael's first task was to restore order in the state. Astrakhan, occupied by the Cossacks of Zarutsky, who was trying to found a Cossack state, was cleared of rebels. Marina Mnishek died in prison, and her son was executed along with Zarutsky.

The huge robber army of Ataman Balovnya reached Moscow and only here was it defeated and most of his people were recaptured. Prince Pozharsky hunted for a long time for the Polish robber, Lisovsky, but it was not possible to disperse his gang until Lisovsky himself died.

It was very difficult to restore obedience and honesty among the governors and officials who were accustomed to the anarchy of the Time of Troubles and tried to govern as they pleased.