Comedy test by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"

1.A. S. Griboyedov wrote: “In my comedy there are 25 fools for one sane person, and this person, of course, is at odds with the society around him.” . Who did the writer have in mind: a). Skalozub b).Molchalin c).Chatsky d).Sofia

2. “Signed, off your shoulders” A). Sophia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d). Famusov d). Gorich z).Skalozub z).Repetilov

3. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of his era. Match characters comedy and speech samples: “...To give ranks, there are many channels ».

A).

4. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples: “What about our old people? It’s not that new things were introduced - never, God save us! No. And they will find fault with this, that, and more often than not, they will argue, make noise, and... disperse.”

A).

5. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples: “He never said a smart word.”

A). Sophia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d). Famusov d).Gorich g).Skalozub z).Repetilov

6. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples: “Tell me to go into the fire: I’ll go as if I’m going to dinner.” . A). Sofia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d).Famusov d).Gorich g).Skalozub h).Repetilov

7. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples: “Out of boredom you will whistle the same thing ».

A). Sofia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d).Famusov d).Gorich g).Skalozub h).Repetilov

8. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples: "Yes smart person can’t help but be a rogue.”

A). Sofia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d).Famusov d).Gorich g).Skalozub h).Repetilov

9. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the comedy characters and speech samples:“What do I hear?” A). Sofia b).Chatsky c).Molchalin d).Famusov d).Gorich g).Skalozub h).Repetilov

10. An aphorism is: a).artistic justification for the actions of the heroes. b). a short saying containing a complete philosophical thought, worldly wisdom or moral teaching. c) part of the vocabulary, words and phrases used in the past to designate any objects, to create historical flavor.

11. Analyzing speech characteristics heroes of the comedy “Woe from Wit”, determine which “words and buzzwords” correspond to the characters of A. S. Griboyedov: servility, prejudice, towards a free life, smoke of the fatherland A).

12. Analyzing the speech characteristics of the heroes of the comedy “Woe from Wit”, determine which “words and catchphrases” correspond to the characters of A. S. Griboyedov: cracked, headlong, fainted, made a mistake, sergeant major, bruised. A).Lisa b) Chatsky c) Molchalin d). Khlestova d). Skalozub

13. Analyzing the speech characteristics of the heroes of the comedy “Woe from Wit”, determine which “words and catchphrases” correspond to the characters of A. S. Griboyedov: two-s; still, sir; forgive me, for God's sake; little face, angel.

14. Analyzing the speech characteristics of the heroes of the comedy “Woe from Wit”, determine which “words and catchphrases” correspond to the characters of A. S. Griboedov:It's been a while since they called, it's gone, I'll report to me, sir.

a).Liza b)Chatsky c)Molchalin d).Khlestova d).Skalozub

15. Analyzing the speech characteristics of the heroes of the comedy “Woe from Wit”, determine which “words and catchphrases” correspond to the characters of A. S. Griboedov: I've been dragging along for an hour, I've been tearing my ears, it's time to get mad.

a).Liza b)Chatsky c)Molchalin d).Khlestova d).Skalozub Answers:

1.c; 2.g; 3.d; 4.g; 5.a; 6.b; 7.d; 8.z; 9.a; 10.b; 11.b; 12.d; 13.c; 14.a; 15.g;

>Essays on the work Woe from Wit

The Problem of the Mind in Comedy

About his work “Woe from Wit” A. S. Griboyedov wrote: “In my comedy there are 25 fools for one sane person.” This expression alone characterizes the meaning of the book. We understand that we are talking about eternal problem mind and stupidity. For its time, it was a cutting-edge comedy promoting a new movement. The main character according to his knowledge and life principles close to the Decembrists. He is smart, but not calculating, courageous, but does not show arrogance, open to new ideas, but knows how to cast doubt on them. A. A. Chatsky is a hero of the new generation, although for Famusov’s society he is an “extra” person. According to the plot of the play, he was not afraid to confront an entire army of ignoramuses.

Griboyedov considers Pavel Afanasyevich Famusov, as well as all his colleagues and friends, to be ignoramuses and uneducated people. In fact, we see that this is the case. The author shows how such uncouth and illiterate people like Famusov occupied the most important ranks in Moscow at the beginning of the 19th century. How such scoundrels like Molchalin served and flattered in order to rise through career ladder. How did such rude people like Skalozub become colonels without having a single military feat behind them? The question inevitably arises, how did this happen? Unfortunately, society by that time was so “rotten” that another revolution could not be avoided. People had to understand that it was time to develop and reach new heights.

Chatsky’s goal, as a reasonable person, was precisely this - to convey to the nobles that one cannot remain at the same level of lack of education, one must move on. You cannot ignore books and other manifestations of art, you cannot use foreign words in Russian speech and wear dresses cut like “French milliners”, and then claim that you are a patriot of your country. All these topical problems are touched upon by Griboyedov in his acclaimed comedy. And most importantly, we see how people of advanced minds suffered surrounded by the “Famus society.” In essence, according to the level mental development Only Sophia could compete with Chatsky, and even she was too dependent on other people’s opinions.

It’s not for nothing that the author chose such a symbolic name for her. Probably, by this he wanted to emphasize the “wisdom” of Sophia, who nevertheless acts as a dual character. It is difficult to categorize her into any one camp. In intelligence and education, she kept up with the times, and in terms of education, she belonged to the “Famus society.” On the one hand, she could become a reliable companion and ally for Chatsky, and on the other, we see that she is completely imbued with “noble” ideology. In the final part of the comedy, Famusov’s society managed to oust the protagonist from their circles, but this was only due to the fact that they took in numbers, and if there are more like Chatsky, then the “Famusov society” will collapse.

A.S. Griboyedov. "Woe from Wit." 9th grade.

1. To what ideological and aesthetic direction, artistic method can the comedy of A.S. be attributed? Griboyedov "Woe from Wit":

1. educational realism 2. romanticism

3. critical realism 4. classicism

2. A.S. Griboedov wrote: “In my comedy there are 25 fools for one sane person, and this person, of course, is in conflict with the society around him.” Who did the writer mean:

1. Skalozub 2. Molchalin 3. Chatsky 4. Sofia

3. Each image of comedy reflects the specific historical essence of real social types of its era. Match the existing ones Comedy faces and speech samples:

1. “Well, the ball!.. Some freaks from the other world. And there’s no one to talk to, and no one to dance with,” “Signed, off your shoulders,” “No rest, I’m rushing around like crazy,” “I’m invited to trout on Tuesday.”

2. “Three fathoms is a daredevil”, “...To give ranks there are many channels”, “I am a prince - I will give Gregory and you a sergeant-major to Voltaire...”, “He never uttered a smart word”

3. “What about our old people?? It’s not that new things were introduced - never, God save us! No. And they’ll find fault with this, that, or more often than not, they’ll argue, make noise, and... go their separate ways.”

4. “Huh? Hm? And - hmm?

5. “What do I hear?”, “You know that I don’t value myself”

6. “Tell me to the fire: I’ll go as if for dinner,” “I’ve sobered up... completely”

1. Chatsky 2. Repetilov 3. Skalozub

4. Sophia 5. Prince Tugoukhovsky 6. Famusov

4. An aphorism is:

1. Artistic justification of the characters’ actions.

2. A short saying containing a complete philosophical thought, worldly wisdom or moral teaching.

3. Part of the vocabulary, words and phrases used in the past to designate any objects, to create historical flavor.

5. Which of the characters owns the following expressions that have become aphorisms:

1. “The legend is fresh, but hard to believe,” “The houses are new, but the prejudices are old,” “Who are the judges?”

2. “I don’t dare advise you”, “I scared you, forgive me, for God’s sake”

3. “Happy people don’t watch the clock”, “Walked into a room, ended up in another”, “Not a man, a snake”, “The hero of not my novel”

1. Chatsky 2. Sofia 3. Molchalin

6. Determine which words and phrases correspond to the characters of the comedy:

1. “Slavery”, “prejudice”, “towards a free life”, “tea”, “colitis”, “smoke of the fatherland”

2. “Cracked”, “headlong”, “fainted”, “gave a blunder”, “femme”, “bruised”.

3. “Two, sir,” “still, sir,” “forgive me, for God’s sake,” “little face,” “angel.”

4. “It’s passed,” “as long as it’s been,” “they’re calling,” “I’ve buried,” “I’ll report,” “to me, sir.”

5. “Trudge”, “the clock is ticking”, “it was torn by the ears”, “it’s time to get mad.”

1. Skalozub 2. Chatsky 3. Liza 4. Khlestova 5. Molchalin

7. Composition is:

1. An episode of a literary work.

2. Organization of individual elements, parts and images of a work of art.

3. The main question posed in the literary work.

4. Collision, confrontation of characters.

8. Genre originality of the work by A.S. Griboyedov is expressed in the definition of the genre:

1. Comedy 2. Tragedy 3. Tragicomedy

9. A critical article “A Million Torments” was written by:

1. D.I.Pisarev 2. V.G.Belinsky

3. I.A.Goncharov 4. N.A.Dobrolyubov

A.S. Griboyedov “Woe from Wit.” Key.

1 – Famusov, 2 – Skalozub, 3 – Repetilov, 4 – Prince Tugoukhovsky, 5 – Sophia, 6 – Chatsky.

1 – Chatsky, 2 – Molchalin, 3 – Sophia.

1 – Chatsky, 2 – Skalozub, 3 – Molchalin, 4 – Liza, 5 – Khlestova.

Everyone who has read the work of A.S. Griboyedov should understand it and conduct a little analysis, because few people are able to answer the question posed unambiguously...

What is stupidity? Stupidity is an act, and an act is born from a goal, so in the work of A.S. Griboyedov. Each hero is driven by his own goal, his own dream, and everyone has his own purpose, but these “25 fools” must be united by something, and they are united by their love of money, the desire for rank and mutual responsibility. And how can I call these people stupid? No, they are corrupt, careerists, greedy people to the point of horror, but they are not stupid.

Our experts can check your essay using Unified State Exam criteria

Experts from the site Kritika24.ru
Teachers of leading schools and current experts of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation.

It is possible that there is no soul in them and there, in the soul, they are completely empty and uneducated than, as main character- Chatsky, who is smart and constantly “hungry for knowledge.” All of them, although they didn’t build this terrible system where everything is based on yes-men and money, they settled in very well there, and that means something.

The author's position is clearly clear. The author believes that a person should be guided by intangible benefits, and he should not strive for rank or honor, as did only the only character in the poetic comedy - Chatsky. He went against this society and that is why he became the first “superfluous man” in Russian literature. The author points out that everyone around him is stupid. I completely agree with the author’s position that true goals should not be material, but exactly “25 fools” does not think so, Famusov says: “God bless you with health and the rank of general,” each of the characters is so obsessed with money and ranks that perhaps they can be called fools, but stupidity is a multifaceted word. I’m not afraid to call Chatsky stupid; he could have guessed that retraining Famus society was completely pointless. He is only throwing pearls before swine, but he still tries, says Chatsky: “I would be glad to serve, but it’s sickening to be served.” He can be called naive or stupid, there are no more boundaries. Emotions, goals, dreams, money, love...everything is mixed in this work. Some are stupid in their souls, some in their heads, and some are simply naive, like Chatsky.

In that small world Griboedova. Everyone is up in arms against Chatsky and shames him for not being like everyone else. He doesn’t believe in all these riches and ranks, he believes in love. We are accustomed to judging people by their actions, by the result, even though he did not achieve his love - Sophia, he left with dignity, he left with a phrase that future generations remembered, Chatsky exclaimed: “A carriage for me, a carriage!” In conclusion I want to say that

Chatsky is the only character who was smart, but as a paradox, really did not understand what was happening and how to deal with all this.

Updated: 2018-05-07

Attention!
If you notice an error or typo, highlight the text and click Ctrl+Enter.
By doing so, you will provide invaluable benefit to the project and other readers.

Thank you for your attention.