“World Evil against Russia”, held in Moscow on February 28, 2015. The conference was moderated by Tatyana Lemesheva. The main report was read by V.N. Osipov. The burning problems of our time were touched upon: the war of international Freemasonry with Orthodoxy and Russia, the Second Vatican Council and the Judaization of Catholicism, Satanism in the USA, the betrayal of the Patriarchate of Constantinople and especially Washington’s faithful ally and CIA informant Patriarch Bartholomew, anti-Christ globalization, the three mondialist structures of the World Government, treachery Judas Gorbachev and the role of his Foundation for the creation of the United Religions, etc.

Vice-President of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems K.N. Sokolov spoke about the struggle of world evil against all humanity. He also described the education reform in the Russian Federation as a complete transition to NATO education.

The bright speech of the honorary lawyer of the Moscow Region Bar Association, I.Yu. Chepurnaya, included the theme of the myth of the divinely chosen Jews, destroyed by Christ, the Russian state as the Holder of evil, the need to resist world evil, incl. personal and communal repentance, the unceasing Jesus Prayer, observance of the Gospel commandments and firm standing in the faith. It is necessary to continue working to protect the constitutional rights of Russian citizens, incl. the right to “live and act in accordance with one’s religious beliefs.” It was noted that Patriarch Kirill raised his voice in the State Duma regarding a number of anti-people laws, incl. about digital identity. But, unfortunately, there are still questions. The Church has not yet said its word about the spiritual meaning of digital identification.

I.M. Chislov, writer, chairman of the Russian-Serbian Friendship Society, dedicated his speech to the mystery of lawlessness. The God-bearing people are fighting against the God-killing people. Near Debaltsevo, the Americans who fought with the people of Novorossiya and the Israeli special forces were released. Angela Merkel especially zealously worked for the release of Israeli soldiers.

N.N. Mishustin, head of the working group for the protection of families and children under the Moscow City Duma, said with bitterness that they were again concluding agreements with other states on the adoption of children from Russia. Such an agreement was signed, for example, with Spain, a country where sodomy is rampant today, and with a dozen other countries, even with Uruguay. Where do they get such love for our children? Or are they needed for organs? There are four “blue” theaters in Moscow. The current school card is a children's UEK. Black transplant surgeons flew to Serbia before the war to take advantage of the wounded and children.

T.S. Lemesheva recalled that the UN condemned Nazism and other forms of racial discrimination. At the same time, the UN Children's Fund recognizes same-sex marriage. Members of the ruling Kyiv junta have a second citizenship - Jewish. Did Bandera's followers fraternize with Zionism? I am surprised by the tolerant attitude towards homosexuality. She made a proposal to legislate the responsibility of deputies who initiate the adoption of anti-people laws that are aimed at discriminating against Orthodox Christians in Russia and do not ensure the safety of the Russian people and other citizens of the Russian Federation.

At the conference on February 28, 2015, a resolution on Kolomoisky was unanimously adopted. It will be sent to the Pan-European Jewish Congress, the Russian Jewish Congress, the Government of Ukraine, the Government of the State of Israel and the UN. The resolution demands immediate and harsh condemnation of the actions of the governor of the Dnepropetrovsk region of Ukraine, Igor Kolomoisky, who is one of the individuals who sponsored not only the bloody actions of the so-called. Maidan, which then led to a coup d'etat in Ukraine, but also now contains fascist paramilitary units “Aidar”, “Dnepr”, “Right Sector” and others. Unlike other figures of the damned days in Ukraine, Igor Kolomoisky is a zealous Jew, a permanent parishioner of the Dnepropetrovsk and Kyiv synagogues, strictly observing the canons of Judaism, and therefore also holds the post of President of the Pan-European Jewish Congress..

“Is it possible to combine such a high position, liturgical activities, and simply belonging to the Jewish people with acts the most severe executions the Slavic population of Ukraine, the genocide and holocaust of the Russian people of the south-east of Ukraine?... We believe that the Jewish people, who also suffered from the world fascist upheavals, are obliged to stop the atrocities of their co-religionist and the leader of the Pan-European Jewish Congress.”

Poet Nikolai Bogolyubov spoke about the criminal case initiated against his poetic work.

E.B. Malyutina spoke about the impudence of officials who demand the surrender of personal data for any reason. They even refuse to accept the Unified State Exam without first submitting personal data. In Yaroslavl I had to go to court. But, unfortunately, even Orthodox clergy spoke out against parents who protect their children from sharing personal data with everyone (including bandits and the NATO bloc). They do not care about the principled position of the Hierarchy, personally Patriarch Kirill, who condemn the forced surrender of personal data. But the Yaroslavl court (the lawyer for the persecuted was Irina Yuryevna Chepurnaya) in August 2014 ruled in favor of the parents and their children. And, despite the court’s decision, the Ministry of Education and other authorities still require the submission of personal data

The conference adopted a detailed resolution on legal issues:

We demand a ban on assigning digital identifiers and artificially created digital names to a person. The draft Federal Law “On the main identification document of a citizen of the Russian Federation” is clearly anti-constitutional in nature. If adopted, it will create a threat to the national security of Russia and its citizens. We demand the denunciation (termination) of international documents (Conventions, Charters) recommending or obliging Russia to join a supranational entity - the global information society. Cancel federal laws and by-laws adopted on the basis of these international documents, incl. “Concept for the formation of the information society in Russia” dated May 28, 1999 No. 32, “Strategy for the development of the electronic industry in Russia for the period until 2025”, “Concept for the formation of electronic government in Russia until 2010” etc., because all these documents are aimed at building an illegal “electronic government”, at the abolition of all fundamental constitutional rights and freedoms of man and citizen. And also for chipping, cloning and destroying the binary code of humanity. Repeal federal laws: “On the provision of state and municipal services” (No. 210). “On personal data” (No. 152 of April 1, 1996), “On individual (personalized) accounting in the compulsory pension insurance system” ((No. 27 of December 15, 2001) and the like. Prohibit medical institutions and insurance campaigns from using human identity identifiers (EPP, SNILS), identification chips, barcodes, nano-devices, cybernization of the human body and brain.

Enshrine at the legislative level the prohibition of taking children away from their parents without a judicial procedure... ban the practice of using Western-style juvenile justice in Russia.

Abolish the colonial Article 15 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation on the priority of international laws over domestic laws. Restore the state-forming status of the Russian people.

The Constitution of the Russian Federation recognizes Orthodoxy as the state religion in the manner prescribed by law.

Ban Russophobia in the media and introduce spiritual and moral censorship on it. Introduce the subject “Fundamentals of Orthodox Culture” in schools from the 1st grade of primary school.

In order to protect our Fatherland and personal self-defense, based on the legislation of the Russian Federation, we demand:

- Talmudic ideology and guidelines for action - the book “Kitzur Shulchan Aruch” (with its primary sources) is rightfully and factually declared extremist and banned...

- officially recognize by right - the Holocaust of the Russian Orthodox people during the organized and carried out Masonic October Revolution with the ritual murder of the holy royal martyrs and passion-bearers, as well as during the repressions in the post-revolutionary period, the Holocaust of the Kuban, Don and Terek Cossacks in 1919 - 1923, in Crimea. ......

We share and support the serious views expressed in the following documents:

- Memorandum of Holy Mount Athos on the need for the Russian Orthodox Church to withdraw from the World Council of Churches.

- Message of June 3, 1998 of the Holy Synod of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, expressed in that “the process of falling away from God and His grace... is now secretly taking place in the depths of human hearts,” and “... an individual identification number (with the above conditions) ... can become the seal of the Antichrist.”

- the decision of the Greek Orthodox Church, which called on its children to refuse electronic documents,

- the voice of the fathers of the Pochaev Lavra, Moldova, desert dwellers, monk Constantine and the brethren of the Holy Trinity Skete, founded in 1973 in the Caucasus Mountains with the blessing of St. Seraphim of Glinsky and Sukhumi,

- a sober attitude to this issue of bishops and elders of other Local Churches who do not approve of the adoption of digital identifiers,

...Accepting a digital identifier is a manifestation of “humble” submission and the beginning of serving the coming Antichrist in the person of the behind-the-scenes of the “new world order.”

In order to end disagreements and achieve the intra-church unanimity commanded by Christ, we believe that it is necessary to continue the consideration of the problem begun by the commission of the Inter-Council Presence and

1) To give a theological assessment of the essence of the sin of accepting personal digital identifiers in the light of the New Testament commandments of Christ,

2) Continue work on the Document “On the position of the Church...” not only in the context of church-state relations, but also in the light of patristic teaching on this topic,

3) To develop and publish a comprehensive concept of the position of the Church, to bring it to the consciousness of all believers, calling for more zealous and diligent living according to the Gospel commandments.

4) We hope that the hierarchy will find it expedient to continue and deepen the theological discussion of this issue....

This Resolution should be sent to: the President of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the heads of factions of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the relevant committees of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation, the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation, the FSB of the Russian Federation, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation , Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Federal Migration Service of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation... To the governors of regions, territories and heads of republics, in the media..., and also To His Holiness the Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Rus', DECR, Archpastors of the Russian Orthodox Church MP.

Participants of the conference “World Evil against Russia”: V.N. Osipov, I.Yu. Chepurnaya, T.S. Lemesheva, I.M. Chislov, E.A. Pavlov, L.S. Nemchinova, E.A. Kirichenko , M.M. Obolensky, M. Abdullin, S.A. Matveev and others (about 350 people).

We ask you to consider this resolution as an official Appeal from representatives of public organizations and citizens of the Russian Federation.

The conference lasted eight hours, from 12 to 20, and was held on a highly spiritual level.

Conference on the topic: “World evil against Russia.” (Part -1)

the report was read by V.N. Osipov. The burning problems of our time were touched upon: the war of international Freemasonry with Orthodoxy and Russia, the Second Vatican Council and the Judaization of Catholicism, Satanism in the USA, the betrayal of the Patriarchate of Constantinople

Conference on the topic: “World evil against Russia.” (Part -2)

Vivid speech by honorary lawyer of the Moscow Region Bar Association I.Yu. Chepurnaya

Conference on the topic: “World evil against Russia.” (Part -3)

Conference on the topic: “World evil against Russia.” (Part -4)

There is a lot of material on the conference here
"World evil against Russia"

ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE NEWSPAPER "ORTHODOX CROSS"

AGAIN ABOUT THE FUTURE
"PAN ORTHODOX CATHEDRAL"

On the initiative of the public movement “Resistance to the New World Order” on April 12 this year. was organized in Moscow round table“What is the danger of the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council” in 2016?” The event was attended by clergy and laity who actively opposed the spread of ecumenism and renovationism and defended the purity of Orthodoxy and conciliar principles in the Church of Christ.

Speakers: head of the movement “Resistance to the New World Order”, writer, member of the Union of Writers of Russia Vladimir Nikolaevich Osipov; cleric of the Church of the Icon of the Mother of God “Joy of All Who Sorrow” at the Kalitnikovskoye Cemetery in Moscow, priest Pavel Burov; rector of the Church of St. Nicholas on Bersenevka in Moscow, Hegumen Kirill (Sakharov); cleric of the Assumption Cathedral in Kolomna, Archpriest Igor Tarasov; candidate of historical sciences, associate professor, teacher at MGIMO Olga Nikolaevna Chetverikova and many others. For our readers who do not have the opportunity to watch the two-part video recording of the round table on the Internet, we have prepared a review of some of the speeches made in the first part.

Opening the round table, its moderator, an Orthodox lawyer Irina Yurievna Chepurnaya explained the purpose of the event: "For several recent years Patriarch Bartholomew (Archondonis) of Constantinople has taken a number of steps aimed at accelerating the convening of the so-called “Holy and Great Pan-Orthodox Council,” which has been in preparation for more than half a century. The need to intensify preparations for the council was also discussed at the last meeting of the Primates of the Local Orthodox Churches, held on March 6–9 this year. in the Patriarchal Cathedral of St. George the Victorious on Phanar (Istanbul), which was attended by delegations of 13 Local Orthodox Churches: Constantinople, Alexandria, Antioch, Jerusalem, Russian, Georgian, Serbian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Cypriot, Hellenic, Albanian and Polish . During the meeting, it was decided to convene the “Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church” in Constantinople in 2016, unless unforeseen circumstances prevent this. Commenting on the agreement reached at the meeting, some clergy and journalists expressed satisfaction with the approach of “an important event for the entire Orthodox world” (see interview with the head of the Synodal Information Department of the Russian Orthodox Church Vladimir Legoyda to the Interfax-religion news agency). But is the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council” really necessary for the Ecumenical Church of Christ? Or are the believers right who are convinced that it will not serve to strengthen the unity of world Orthodoxy, but, on the contrary, will bring confusion into the minds and hearts of Christians all over the world?..” Next, the presenter formulated the main question, which the audience were called upon to answer: “Do we, Orthodox believers, need this cathedral or not?” and gave the floor V.N. Osipov.

Vladimir Nikolaevich first of all turned to the history of the emergence of the Orthodox Church. Formed by the holy apostles, it initially consisted of separate communities scattered throughout the Roman Empire and subject to persecution from the pagans. Then Emperor Constantine the Great granted Christianity the status of state religion. At this time, the majority of the Empire's population adhered to paganism or heresies. Only 10% were Christians, on whom Saint Constantine relied. Realizing that the spread of heretical teachings would seduce and turn away many people from the faith and the Church, the Emperor took upon himself the work of strengthening the church and decided to convene an Ecumenical Council.

Ecumenical Council- This the highest authority of the Church of Christ, guided by the Holy Spirit. Touching upon the history of the First Ecumenical Council, Vladimir Nikolaevich noted that it was held in 325 in Nicaea and it discussed the false teaching of the Alexandrian priest Arius, who rejected the Divinity and the eternal birth from the Father of the Son of God, our Lord Jesus Christ. 318 Holy Fathers, among whom were Saints Nicholas the Wonderworker, Spyridon of Trimifuntsky, Hosea of ​​Corduba, Alexander and Athanasius of Alexandria and many others, condemned the heresy of Arius and approved the doctrine of the Divinity of the Son of God, drawing up the Creed.

The speaker also briefly spoke about subsequent Ecumenical Councils and the issues considered at them. The last, Seventh Ecumenical Council took place in 787 in Constantinople and approved the veneration of icons; and the memory of the Holy Fathers of the Seven Ecumenical Councils is celebrated by the Orthodox Church on May 18/31. “The property of veneration of the Holy Fathers of the Ecumenical Councils is that– emphasized V.N. Osipov, – that only these Seven Ecumenical Councils, fully expressing the faith, will and reason of the Catholic Church, the fullness of Orthodoxy, have the right to make infallible and binding decisions for everyone in the field of the Christian faith and church dispensation.”

“Only with support and in close unity with the Kingdom can the priesthood endure, survive, and grow stronger. Without the Kingdom, the priesthood is unthinkable. All Seven Ecumenical Councils took place either by direct convocation of the Imperial government, or with its active support,”- said the writer. He noted that “all the Seven Ecumenical Councils solved the key problems of their time, decided how to navigate the church ship through reefs and shoals.”

After historical excursion the speaker addressed the problem of the upcoming “Pan-Orthodox Council”: “And suddenly, in the secular, post-Christian, Masonic 20th century, the church nomenklatura decides to do without a Tsar, without the support of sacred power, and at the same time not to fight any heresy, but to proclaim and approve its own new heresy - the super-heresy of ecumenism. Who is the initiator?

This was followed by a story about the organizer of the “Pan-Orthodox Council”, Patriarch-modernist Bartholomew (Archondonis), and the reforms that he wants, with the help of this forum, to carry out and approve in all Local Churches: the New Calendar calendar, weakening of fasts, deuteramy of the clergy, married episcopate and heresies-heresies – ecumenism.

The presenter focused on the topic of ecumenism, quoting the words of Elder Paisius the Holy Mountain of blessed memory: “This serpent has three heads: for the rich - Freemasonry, for the poor - communism, for the Orthodox - ecumenism.” I.Yu. Chepurnaya emphasized that the “Resistance Movement to the New World Order”, which organized the round table, is fighting not only against globalization, but also against ecumenism.

Olga Nikolaevna Chetverikova in her speech she analyzed in detail the stages of preparation for the council, as well as the last Istanbul meeting. She said that the “Pan-Orthodox Council” project is a clearly developed plan that has a specific goal, the ways of implementation of which are quite well known. Project “began to be implemented in 1962, i.e. after 1959, when Pope John XXIII came to power in the Vatican, already then, in January of this year, declaring the need for a second Vatican Council to resolve the issue of opening the Catholic “Church” to the world in accordance with new circumstances and conditions of activity. And in 1961, the first Rhodes Conference convened by Patriarch Athenagoras met, at which it was announced that preparations for the “Pan-Orthodox Council” had begun.”

Olga Nikolaevna touched upon the history of the Second Vatican Council and the new Uniate concept put forward by the Vatican: “This new concept of ecumenism allowed Catholics to open up to dialogue with other religions, while maintaining complete integrity of the rule of the Pope. In fact, we can define Catholic ecumenism as a new form of union. That is, the ecumenism that the Vatican offers us is actually a union, its unofficial form.” We are constantly told about the need for Christian unity. But then “The unity that Catholics seek, that the Pope craves, is only possible if the Orthodox Churches recognize the Roman Pontiff as the successor of Peter and the head of the Christian Church.”

Continued on page 7

© ORTHODOX CROSS. Reproduction of materials with reference to the source is permitted.

"The Ugly Tower of the New World Order"

At the conference “World Evil against Russia,” its participants proposed methods for saving the country and earthly civilization

Image: Imagno/Getty Images/Fotobank

The conference “World Evil against Russia” (that’s right, via i) was held at the Central House of Tourists, organized by the Orthodox Revival Union and the Resistance to the New World Order movement. Those gathered unanimously came to the conclusion that the “last days” had come, but Russia has salvation - to return to traditional values ​​and unite in the fight against Khazaria and the “electronic concentration camp.”

In the lobby in front of the conference hall, 30 minutes before the start, visitors began to arrive - mostly elderly people, good-looking women in headscarves (one of them had a badge with a portrait of Nicholas II pinned on her clothes), as well as a small number of young activists. Visitors walked between tables with all kinds of literature devoted to the conspiracy of world Jewry, the dangers of the electronic passport, and opposition to all this disgrace.

The three main leaflets, which were distributed to everyone for free, were replete with classic information in such an environment about the satanic barcode, which hides the number of the Beast, and also that in general everything electronic documents it is necessary for the Antichrist to have the tools of control over people in his hands. Particularly unlucky was SNILS (individual personal account insurance number), “the key to all databases about a person who has all the signs of an apocalyptic mark.” “This green card, to the delight of sodomites, provides for a change of gender of the owner - pay attention,” noted the compiler of the leaflet.

A couple of men in their 60s were exchanging remarks regarding the liberal politician Boris Nemtsov, who had been killed the day before.

He died for his Jewish causes. Somewhere at one or two o’clock there was a loud bang, in St. Petersburg, I think,” one said.
“No, in Moscow,” the second objected.
“The Americans promised to increase pressure on us - of course, they killed their own,” said a woman standing at the table with thematic brochures confidently.

The conference hall, like the lobby, was full of impressively sized posters with the slogans “To whom the church is not a mother, God is not a father,” “Holy Rus' is invincible!”, “Today - a number, tomorrow - a card, the day after tomorrow - a seal,” “We demand the adoption of a law on a traditional paper passport.” Most notable was a hand-drawn poster depicting a black raven with an electronic passport in its talons and a white dove holding an olive branch. The composition was completed by the inscription “No to the electronic concentration camp!”

Women in headscarves briskly scurried around the hall, looking for places closer to the speakers, took up chairs, and more and more posters, flags and slogans appeared on the walls, which were carefully hung by members of the conference presidium. Before the start of the event, a mustachioed middle-aged man recited the Lord’s Prayer in an anxious voice, which was echoed by almost the entire audience. Dozens of voices repeating words in a sing-song voice in different tones created a frightening dissonance.

The first to read his report was publicist Vladimir Osipov, who is both the head of the Christian Revival union and the leader of the Resistance to the New World Order movement. The very first words of Osipov, a man of respectable age, sitting in a wheelchair, left no doubt about the essence of the “world’s evil”: it turned out to be Jews and Freemasons.

The speaker especially noted the services to Russia of the nationalist writer Oleg Platonov, calling him “an intelligence officer of Holy Rus' who penetrated into the United States and visited many important Masonic lodges, finding out their criminal secrets.” Osipov said that, according to Platonov, the destruction of Orthodox statehood leads to the reign of the Antichrist and in the current situation, the Russian Orthodox Church is the only one that has preserved the purity of the apostolic doctrine. According to him, at the beginning of the 20th century the authorities in European countries passed into the hands of the Freemasons, and in the USA belonged to them from the very beginning. He called America "a territory of denationalized nomads concerned with things, goods and sex."

Osipov explained that Freemasons in the United States oppress Christians, fighting the installation of Christian symbols in institutions and schools, and the Church of Satan has been accepted into the country's National Council of Churches. The publicist said that more than a hundred Satanic chaplains served in the American army. “Against this background, allowing US military personnel to have sex with animals seems like a trifle,” he stated. The writer also noted that in 1987, “Mason President Reagan publicly acknowledged the important role of Satanism in modern American life.”

Osipov then began to denounce Karl Marx, whom he called “the main devil-worshipper,” and his followers, talking about how the Soviet government destroyed churches and killed clergy. The collapse of the USSR did not bring relief, because forces allegedly came to power that openly worshiped Satan and oriented the country “toward integration into the Judeo-Masonic civilization.”

The writer did not ignore such an important topic as homosexuality. He said that if in the 19th century the proportion of people with a non-standard sexual orientation in the United States did not exceed 2 percent, now, after allowing “propaganda,” it has reached 25 percent. The leader of the “Resistance to the New World Order” did not explain where he got such data from (according to the US Census, in 2010 the proportion of people with an alternative sexual orientation in it was 3.8 percent).

Then Osipov quickly went through the Vatican pontiffs - all of them, as it turned out, had sold out to the Freemasons and Satan. The writer said that Pope Pius XI considered Christians to be “spiritual Semites” and coordinated his decisions with the rabbis, and Pope John Paul II openly joined the Masonic lodge. Osipov was also not pleased by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, who is allegedly fully supported by the United States and is preparing to liquidate Orthodoxy at the Eighth Ecumenical Council in 2016 through the implementation of reformist policies.

The writer also spoke about the reduction of the world's population in the interests of the “golden billion”, the dangers of cosmopolitanism, and also did not forget to recall the “Dulles Plan”. At the end of his speech, Osipov added that the militias of Novorossiya are inspired by God, the Tsar and the Fatherland, and on their banner is the face of Christ. “We saw it on TV,” he noted.

Following Osipov, Konstantin Sokolov, vice-president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, came to the podium. His task was to explain to the audience what was happening in the world.

According to him, Russia is the center of the world, and that is why the West wants to conquer it, making Russians slaves and servants. Sokolov said that the United States already has a large system of concentration camps, waiting in the wings - unwanted residents of their country (Latin Americans and blacks) will be sent to them. “You can type REX 84 on the Internet and see how American concentration camps, railway prisons have been prepared and are now mothballed, and multimillion-dollar stocks of plastic coffins have been made,” he informed the audience.

Sokolov also urged not to rely on the Russian government - after all, its multi-billion dollar assets are stored in the West. As an example of the pro-Western position of the state leadership, he cited the failed capture of Mariupol by the DPR forces, when the pro-Russian militias were stopped two steps away from taking the city. Sokolov also spoke about the world's behind-the-scenes plans for Ukraine: supposedly there are plans to reduce its population to 8 million people and revive Khazaria with its capital in Dnepropetrovsk.

He, like the people talking in the lobby, attributed Nemtsov’s murder to a provocation by the West, to a signal for the gathering of the Maidan and “bringing pro-Western forces into a mobilized state.” Sokolov urged not to believe the “paid” Duma and the Federation Council, which “gave Siberia to the Chinese.”

Orthodox lawyer Irina Chepurnaya began her speech by telling how the Jews, having linked their hopes for the restoration of statehood with the Messiah, rejected the true Messiah Jesus Christ. Now, she said, the Jews are preparing a “voluntary unification of the world” under the control of the Antichrist. “An ugly tower of a new world order is being built,” she stated.

Chepurnaya saw the answers to these challenges in the suppression of passions, the recognition of Orthodoxy as the main religion in Russia and called for “begging for Holy Rus'.” She also emphasized the inadmissibility of introducing digital population identifiers in the country.

The man who sensitively read the “Our Father” at the beginning of the event turned out to be Slavic philologist Ilya Chislov. In his speech, he, first of all, emphasized that now there is a battle between the Russian God-bearing people and the God-killing Jewish people.

Slavist emphasized that Church hierarchs should not attend programs of federal television channels - first of all, programs of the TV presenter “the blasphemous Solovyov.” “If Archpriest Dimitry Smirnov stood up and turned his back to Solovyov, then there would immediately be fewer sodomites, fewer Masons, and Maidan supporters would retreat,” Chislov said.

He also complained that in the area of ​​the Ukrainian village of Debaltsevo, “American, English and Israeli special forces were released from encirclement under the guise of civilians.” “The German Merkel flew with Hollande to petition that the Israeli special forces from the encirclement be released,” the Slavist was indignant. Chislov, however, called not to demonize Western Europe and to equate Europe and the West, since “there will be no fourth Rome in Beijing and Orthodoxy remains the religion of the European race.”

Although it may seem that the speakers were limited to brief abstracts, this is not so - if each report was written down verbatim, there would be enough text for a medium-sized book. The next speaker, Nikolai Mishustin, head of the Moscow City Duma working group on protecting the rights of citizens from the UEC and families and children from juvenile technologies, could claim authorship of an entire section in it. But here only some of the issues he raised will be briefly summarized.

Mishustin began his speech with a report on the success of his activities: it was thanks to the efforts of his group that the adoption of the project to put into operation the UEC (Universal Electronic Card) was postponed for two years. He noted that this period should be devoted to the fight to cancel the project. “Either we will defeat this, or then little will depend on us,” he frightened the audience, stating that otherwise the government “will close in and become dictatorial.”

Ultimately, the uncontrolled collection of information will lead to the distribution of the population into several castes: the first, the creative class, will begin to travel abroad and learn how to command the rest, the second will include workers and peasants, and the third will include slave servants. According to Mishustin, only the scientific paradigm will be acceptable to the state, and supporters of traditional values ​​will begin to be sent to concentration camps.

He ended his report with a warning about an imminent war, the main sign of which he called the increased activity of “black transplantologists.” According to Mishustin, a similar situation was observed in Serbia before the war - the pest doctors who gathered there began to cut out all the prisoners, especially children, internal organs for subsequent transplantation.

Before the adoption of the conference resolution, Tatyana Lemesheva, a member of the “Resistance to the World Order” movement, took the floor. Next to her lay an impressive-looking stack of paper, clearly hinting that her performance would not end quickly. Lemesheva did not disappoint those present - in the middle of the report on Holocaust denial, as well as calls to ban the Jewish book “Shulchan Aruch” as extremist, many in the hall and on the presidium fell into a restless sleep. The speech lasted an hour and a half and became the final, most powerful chord of the event.

At the moment of its completion, half of the hall stood up in a single impulse and began to make their way to the exits, but Irina Chepurnaya asked everyone to stay and vote for an appeal to the Jewish congresses, Israel and the UN with a call to pacify the oligarch Igor Kolomoisky, who, according to the document, is guilty of the war in Ukraine. Those present unanimously voted “yes” and rushed to the doors.

The world is on the verge of major changes. Behind is the New Age with the rise of science, technology, and humanism. Ahead lies the choice of the future path for humanity. What will it be like? The current “lords” of economic, political and military instruments of power are building a “new world order”, where people are individual grains of sand, busy satisfying material needs. Opponents of this “order” unite to preserve the most valuable thing that makes us human and declare their goals.

I. End of an era

Globalization - the unification of markets, information networks, technological advances, ways of life - arose as a result of the development of Western civilization, where in the middle of the 2nd millennium AD. era capitalism was born and the rapid development of science and technology began.

In the 19th century, capitalism became imperialism, where markets were controlled by the power of imperialist powers: the “invisible hand of the market” is impossible without the “invisible fist”. Free competition was pushed to the margins of the market.

By the end of the 20th century, especially after the fall of socialism in the USSR and in Europe, there was a unification of markets now controlled not only by states, but also by transnational corporations - imperialism moved into the stage of globalization. She inherited the worst features of imperialism: the right of the strong in resolving disputes, exploitation of the population of entire regions in favor of the Western “golden billion”. Capitalism without free competition has ceased to be the engine of progress, an increasing share of capital is being withdrawn from production into the sphere of stock and financial speculation - today up to 95% of money circulates in the speculative sphere, the daily turnover of which reaches trillions of dollars.

Scientific progress has become a source of threat to humanity. To the known dangers (use of radioactive materials, harmful emissions, etc.) new ones have been added: cloning, genetic engineering, climate and ionosphere control and others, each of which threatens humans and their environment.

The most important among the latest technologies is methods of mind control: the possibility of constant electronic surveillance of almost everyone replaces democracy its imitation. Literature, music, theater are being forced out, against the will of the people, by ersatz culture - a stupefying, dehumanizing “entertainment”. And even the wealth of languages ​​- the most important tool of any modern culture - is replaced by simplified English, sufficient only for primitive “communication”. Satisfaction of physiological needs has turned into a pursuit of a high - the emerging civilization is not only “hedonic”, but essentially narcotic.

II. “New World Order” – a weapon of disastrous unification

By the means described, the leading globalization forces are trying to complete the “new world order” for the sake of unlimited power over humanity. What are these forces? Not only (and not so much) the governments of the countries of the “golden billion” or official supranational structures - the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank (WB), the World Trade Organization (WTO), etc.

Transnational corporations create informal instruments of influence on the governments and peoples of countries: various committees, foundations, clubs, etc. And now this is already being done almost openly: for example, many decisions of the Bilderberg Club are published and everyone can observe their implementation.

The Committee of 300 and Bilderberg have published lists of their members and tasks (possibly incomplete), proving the validity of previous suspicions about them. Ideologists, designers of the “new world order”, such as J.Attali, Z. Brzezinski– they openly write about the values ​​and prospects of the globalized world, here is the most important: freedom of movement of capital, goods, labor, i.e. a world without countries, without borders - humanity as a mass of “new nomads” seeking maximum income.

However, most of the people in this model will be superfluous - the ideologists of the NWO do not hide this: no more than 20% of the Earth's population will satisfy their needs. Tools have been developed and created to prevent majority protest, which could disrupt the implementation of this model. For the majority of people, an entertainment system (“titetainment”) is offered - something like a pacifier for a baby. The entertainment industry already plays an important role in pacifying dissent. For example, electronic media form a “planned” attitude towards events, directly model behavior, form an uncritical attitude towards the constructed reality, contribute to spiritual degradation - all this makes it easier to control the masses. Already now, the struggle of parties is often only imitated, like “protest” actions, controlled terrorist formations are created. More and more manifestations public life paralyzed by imitation.

Before our eyes, such a means of total control over a person appears as information on electronic media ( plastic cards, microchips), which can be a tool for tracking and even reprisal, because a chip or card accumulates information about a person’s places of stay, his contacts, purchases, financial transactions - i.e. a person's entire life is tracked and remembered. If the presentation of such cards, say, instead of money, is mandatory, a person who has violated a certain prohibition (say, who has joined a rogue party) will lose the opportunity to buy, travel around the city, or simply be on the streets. The world will turn into an “electronic concentration camp.”

Western civilization is preparing such a model for humanity. Obviously, this is a dead end for the whole world. Globalization turns out to be a war against all humanity, against the Russian people, with the goal of destroying a huge number of people and establishing a single super-totalitarian state.

If we want the Earth to have a tomorrow, we need to clearly see the danger today.

III. Another future

This fate has not yet become inevitable; there are forces that can offer a different future. This is the powerful moral and cultural potential of Russia and many other oppressed peoples.

Among political concepts, this is primarily the communist doctrine, which was able to prove the feasibility of a different concept of the world, despite the extremes and perversions that accompany the embodiment of the ideal. In the face of possible global disasters The ideal of solidarity action and cooperation is increasingly in demand - as opposed to the Western principle of competition between everyone and everyone. Humanity has survived thanks to the mutual assistance of people - and will survive thanks to it. The desire for pleasure (hedonism) has always been opposed to curbing momentary whims for the sake of lofty goals. For centuries, the memory of the heroes who sacrificed not only well-being, but also their lives - for the sake of their country and faith, who “lay down their lives for their friends,” has not faded. The priority of the spirit over the flesh allowed many peoples to survive in mortal struggles with invaders and in battles with harsh nature. He filled people's lives with meaning that was not limited to the interval between birth and death.

Over thousands of years of coexistence, many peoples and cultures have developed the principles of mutual tolerance, cooperation, and mutual enrichment of cultures. They will make it possible to preserve the civilizational diversity of humanity - the key to its survival, even if this or that civilization has reached a dead end. We must use this opportunity.

IV. Our fight for the future

The destructive methods of the “new world order” are varied, but the means of resisting them are also varied.. In this struggle there is a place for both the young and the mature, the active and the thoughtful. And although the time for an all-out counter-offensive has not yet come, there are many opportunities for counteraction at different levels: governments of countries and socio-political organizations; councils of self-government and religious communities; creative unions, associations of entrepreneurs and simply friendly associations. Now the main task is to make every effort to stop the most destructive manifestations of the “new world order”: the barbaric exploitation of the majority of the planet’s population (including all the peoples of Russia); suppression of national sovereignties, destruction of the spiritual foundation of society; suppression of individual sovereignty through total electronic control; the use of disastrous technologies (cloning, genetic modification, climate control and others).

In addition to countermeasures, there are also creative tasks. We need to support forms of cooperation based on our ideals as the seeds of the future. This is cooperation in economic activity, in scientific and technological developments. This is self-government at different levels, people's councils - production, parent, community. This is the creation of a cultural and educational environment that resists primitivization and cultural degradation: children's groups, clubs, networks for distributing literature and video materials.

In the conditions of provocations today, it is extremely important not to become a toy in the hands of the creators of the “orange revolutions” and “protests”. It is also important to avoid the danger of becoming a means of satisfying the ambitions of politicians, a bargaining chip for election battles. We can only resist the “new world order” by uniting our efforts. This does not mean that we should abandon our worldviews, which may differ significantly. We are united in opposing the “new world order,” but outside of this struggle we are different and remain different.

We offer cooperation to everyone who understands the danger and is ready to fight with us. And we will win. Live, Earth!

If you want to become an anti-globalist... Be one!

If you understand that the “new world order” is the cause of Russia's current troubles and a threat to your future, you have taken the first step in the fight against it. After all, their goal is to turn our fellow citizens into a thoughtless mass, enjoying beer and chewing gum and believing that they are being led “where they need to go.”

Now - the next effort. Maybe you can open the eyes of more and more new groups of our compatriots to what is happening. Maybe it will be possible to stop us from corrupting our children, turning them into weak-willed appendages of televisions and gaming computer programs. Maybe you can stop the lawlessness of an entrepreneur or official. Maybe save a monument, natural area, scientific center or enterprise from destruction and looting.

You can't do it all alone. But everywhere in Russia there are cells of organizations that have formed Anti-globalist Resistance. You can choose those who are closest to you and invite them to participate in the task that seemed most important to you. You can jointly organize a discussion club to discuss the problems of globalization. Or you can hold a demonstration or picket against US actions. You can create a children's organization - pioneer, military sports, local history. Or you can organize an initiative group against yet another arbitrariness of local authorities. Finally, it is possible to organize an effective “telephone” struggle against television programs or newspapers that allow depictions of violence and obscenity... And all of the above are real actions of our activists, who view them as their fight against the new world order. This was reflected in the programs of the Resistance. You yourself can propose a program of action against those dangers that have not yet been noticed.

Go to our website, read about new actions on the website and in the newspapers of organizations included in the Resistance. Write about your business by email. Take action! As long as we resist, the "new world order" will not bring us to our knees.

At this stage, we are not sure that the decisions of the Council will not be ecumenistic and secular. “That is why we believe that under such conditions it would be better NOT TO CALL THE COUNCIL AT ALL.” At the same time, the fathers rely on such luminaries of Orthodoxy as St. Justin (Popovich), St. Paisius the Svyatogorets and the blessed elder Father Philotheus (Zervakos). It remains for us to add that we fully agree with this opinion.

APPEAL TO THE BISHOP'S COUNCIL

Your Holiness!

Your Eminences!

We, Orthodox Christians of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, participants in the “Resistance to the New World Order” Movement, accepted with satisfaction the refusal of the Orthodox leaders at the meeting in Chambesy from Istanbul as the venue for the Pan-Orthodox Conference due to Turkey’s sharp hostility to Russia.

At the same time, we are embarrassed that this Meeting will still take place, now on the Greek island of Crete. We perceive with great concern the very decision of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople, winner of the US Congressional Gold Medal, friend and loyal ally of Washington, to convene this forum. Moreover, Bartholomew’s decision was made almost immediately after the coup d’etat in Kyiv, inspired by America and the Vatican, and the seizure of power in Ukraine by rabid haters of Russia, “Muscovites” and canonical Orthodoxy. In a situation fraught big war, such Councils are not convened. Unless, of course, the initiators have second thoughts, in in this case- attempts to impose in conditions military threat reforms destructive for Holy Orthodoxy. And undermine the spirit of our people, break its spiritual core.

The idea of ​​such a Conference (or the Eighth Ecumenical Council) arose in Turkey, subject to the Freemasons, shortly after the overthrow of God's Anointed One in Third Rome, after the February catastrophe of 1917. “Free masons” perched themselves on the throne of Constantinople, one of whom Meletios 4th Metaxakis already in 1923 organized the “Pan-Orthodox Congress” for the purpose of the Reformation. Luther carried out the Reformation in the 16th century catholic church. Meletius in the 20th century took up the Reformation in Orthodoxy. The most significant decision of the renovationist patriarch and his minions was the introduction of the Catholic Gregorian calendar so that Christians could celebrate Easter together with Jews, which was strictly prohibited Ecumenical Councils. In 1924, the successors and followers of Meletius in the Patriarchate of Constantinople finally introduced Gregorian calendar, and, alas, they were followed by the Greek and Romanian churches, and in 1948 the Antiochian church. The current Patriarch of Constantinople, Bartholomew, continuing the wickedness of his predecessors, intends to impose the Catholic calendar on all churches at the 8th Council, without fear of the anathema imposed on apostates by the Local Council of 1583.

The Masons won the First World War and, having destroyed traditional national and monarchical states, decided to consolidate their victory over the Church. And in 1965, Patriarch Athenagoras of Constantinople, without permission, without the consent of other Orthodox Churches, lifted the anathema of 1054 from the heretical Catholic Church. He raised the question of convening a Council and held it in 1961 on Fr. Rhodes First Pan-Orthodox Conference on its preparation. A list of 10 topics and 100 subsections was drawn up. Break like that. “Revolution has a beginning, but revolution has no end,” as the Soviet poet Robert Rozhdestvensky wrote. This huge list (including subsections), according to Greek Protopresbyter Theodore Zisis, "was modeled on the list of topics of the Second Vatican Council, which, by a strange coincidence, took place at the same time and is estimated to have INFLUENCED our church leadership." The Second Vatican Council, as is known, completely broke Catholicism, turning it into Judeo-Catholicism or the heresy of the Judaizers.

The International Theological Conference, held on January 21 - 22, 2016 with the blessing of Metropolitan Vladimir of Chisinau and All Moldova, expressed great concern about the secrecy of numerous discussions of the topics planned for the Council: “The final texts remain hidden and secret, they are not published.” Most of the bishops were not informed about the materials of the council.

And only thanks to the persistence of the Russian Orthodox Church and Patriarch Kirill personally, the main question of the upcoming forum, “Relations of the Orthodox Church with the rest of the Christian world,” was finally voiced. And then it turned out that the so-called problem was being exaggerated again. “dialogue” of the Church with confessions separated from it, near and far. The active participation of the Orthodox Church in the Ecumenical movement is again emphasized. The task of restoring the “unity of Christians” is again set.

The Catholic Church after the Second Vatican Council 1962-1965 ceased to be Christian at all, and Protestant sects went even further from church canons, introducing a female priesthood, a female episcopate, approving same-sex marriage and even the ordination of openly homosexual priests. What kind of dialogue with heretics who have gone into wickedness can we talk about? And what kind of “unity” with those who have reached the point of recognizing sodomy can we talk about?

The document adopted by the Pan-Orthodox pre-conciliar meeting in Chambesy in October 2015 and announced by the Assembly of Primates of the Orthodox Churches on November 21-28, 2016 states that the Georgian and Bulgarian Orthodox Churches left the ecumenical World Council of Churches in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Dissenting opinion For some reason, these churches, as well as the position of the Russian Orthodox Church and the Moscow Conference of 1948, regarding ecumenism and the WCC were not voiced. We still do not know why the participation of the Russian Orthodox Church in the WCC (where Protestant heresies predominate) continues. Why have we moved away from the principled canonical position of Archbishop Seraphim Sobolev?

Patriarch Bartholomew, with his Masonic and pro-American position, having about 2 thousand parishioners in Turkey itself, however, claims not only primacy in the Orthodox world, but also acts like a real dictator. It was he who, until January 2016, actually hid documents for the upcoming Council. It was he who reduced the significance of the Council by an order of magnitude, declaring on August 29, 2015 at a meeting of the episcopate of the Patriarchate of Constantinople that this Council cannot be considered Ecumenical, because “Western Christians” will not participate in it, i.e. heretical papists and protestants.

In this regard, at the International Theological Conference in Chisinau it was stated: “From this statement of the Ecumenical Patriarch it follows that the Orthodox Church is not the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, is not a Church with completeness, but is DEFECTIVE.” And further: “We are on the way to the recognition of Baptism and the churchliness of heretics - papists and Protestants.” The Chisinau conference listed 25 errors or heresies shared by the Patriarchate of Constantinople and some of the churches on its team. Why should we cooperate with those who do not recognize our Orthodox Church One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic, but considers it defective? Why should we continue and expand the ecumenical movement, whose founders want to dissolve us and drown us in a host of alien heresies and confessions?

We agree with Metropolitan Vladimir of Chisinau and All Moldova and with the participants of the International Theological Conference (where there were more than 1000 priests and laity) that the methodology for holding the Council and the topics of the main issues for discussion are not only “alien” Orthodox tradition, but also consciously aimed at revising or even changing it. The latest alleged corrections and additions made to the texts of previously prepared documents of the upcoming Council are kept secret. We all look forward with anticipation and concern to their publication in the latest edition, to see whether our fears and worries are confirmed or dispelled, but mainly to ensure that the identity of the Church will be properly expressed.”

At this stage, we are not sure that the decisions of the Council will not be ecumenistic and secular. “That is why we believe that under such conditions it would be better NOT TO CALL THE COUNCIL AT ALL.” At the same time, the fathers rely on such luminaries of Orthodoxy as St. Justin (Popovich), St. Paisius the Svyatogorets and the blessed elder Father Philotheus (Zervakos). It remains for us to add that we fully agree with this opinion.

MOVEMENT “RESISTANCE TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER”.

Head of the “SNMP” Movement V.N. OSIPOV.